|
|
Posted by Sal M. Onella on 09/23/06 04:07
"Quanta" <none@none.NET> wrote in message
news:ef28eg$uaq$1@zinnia.noc.ucla.edu...
>
> "Quanta" <none@none.NET> wrote in message
> news:ef2899$u9m$1@zinnia.noc.ucla.edu...
> >
> > "Jukka Aho" <jukka.aho@iki.fi> wrote in message
> > news:9b1Rg.18133$0z1.4745@reader1.news.jippii.net...
> >> Quanta wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have seen absolutely no 'standard' gammas like you claim. Enlighten
> >>> me.
> >>
> >> <http://google.com/search?q=mac+pc+gamma>
> >> <http://google.com/groups?q=mac+pc+gamma>
> >>
> >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_correction#PC.2C_Ma
> >> c.2C_and_sRGB_standard_gammas>
> >>
> >> --
> >> znark
> >>
> >
> > Averages? Do you know statistics?
> >
> >
>
> PS
>
> The Wikipedia article is technically correct. Note that it ONLY ONLY ONLY
> applies to CRTs....and even then unspecified displays.
>
> None of these articles take into account variability of display settings!
>
>
>
I tried the wikipedia article's split-circle gamma test with a fairly
expensive Viewsonic CRT monitor. It has no onscreen user gamma setting, per
se, so I manipulated the Brightness and Contrast to get it "in compliance"
with the pattern test. The display looked overly bright and washed out.
Blech! I put it back the way it was. Maybe the CD that came with my
monitor contains appropriate gamma tweaks. I hesitate to mess with it.
I know OP Ed Light has a real problem. I had some trouble myself with a
DVD I burned last month from a Mini-DV wedding video. It looks beautiful on
CRT TV's but not so good on the CRT computer monitor -- lot of washout in
the bright areas -- not fixable with the monitor controls.
Windows Photo Editor will do gamma correction. A minor tweak of gamma
there brings the wiki article test circle (copy-paste) into compliance.
Bottom line: Oh, crap, another thing to worry about!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|