|
|
Posted by AlanG on 10/22/30 11:59
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:43:32 +0100, "Roberto Pirezzi"
<roberto_pirezzi@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>"AlanG" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
>news:2scgh25lip6btliunna1570c1n7gmqsd4j@4ax.com...
>>>You pay indirectly to ITV and you have *absolutely* *no* *choice*
>>>about paying for, no TV you don't pay for the BBC but you still pay
>>>for ITV. Fact.
>>
>> Completely wrong.
>> Someone pays for ITV.
>> It isn't me unless I buy the poroduct advertised
>
>Wrong, regardless of whether you buy the "product" you will still end up
>paying.
No i wont
>
>Say a product in the Proctor and Gamble brand is advertised, you may not buy
>that particular product, but you are likely to have purchased P&G products
>previously...and may continue to do so.
No I wont
>It is perfectly conceivable that the
>income from ALL of P&G's range funds their marketing department. As a
>result, as a product end user, you pay. Fact.
I don't.
And more to the point they don't send some hired thug round to extort
the money if I don't
>
>And let's face it, most big brands advertise.
>
>Roberto
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|