|
|
Posted by Richard Crowley on 10/06/06 05:12
> Richard Crowley wrote:
>> "Bill" wrote ...
>>
>>>Out of curiousity, how would they compare to a larger lavlier mic,
>>>like the Shure SM 11, in terms of sound? Is there any reason to use
>>>a larger mic if you can, for sound quality, if you don't need to hide
>>>it?
>>
>>
>> There appears to be no compromise of quality in the smaller
>> microphones. Indeed the high-end, big-budget users all tend
>> to use the tiniest (and most expensive) microphones.
"Bill" wrote ...
> Thanks Richard. I now have all the information I need. The prices
> seem reasonable to me given the expectation of quality.
But the significant premium price for the very tiny mics
seems beyond reasonableness unless you are dealing with
close-up TV shots or period dramas, etc. Certainly not
worth it for your average TV application, and not at all
worth it for audio-only recording, radio, etc.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|