|
|
Posted by Marcus Redd on 10/09/06 13:14
"Sanddancer" <Sanddancer@no.no> wrote in message
news:3mbki21i78mmefm9s32nvpa1ehee12mfaq@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:03:38 +0100, Gareth Halfacree
> <usenet@halfacree.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Sanddancer wrote:
>>> On the subject of your site. I really don't read much into that orb
>>> thing. otherwise my house must be uncredibly haunted. I could do with
>>> a poltergeist to tidy up my mess mind. It took me just 4 shots to get
>>> this large orb while looking at your website:
>>> http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/2035/orbdz4.jpg
>>>
>>> I've had similar results for years with 2 different digital cameras.
>>
>>And you will for many more years, with many more cameras (digital and
>>otherwise). It's dust motes in the air. *All* 'orb' photographs are
>>dust motes in the air being magnified by the way the camera lens bends
>>light.
>>
>>All, that is, except 'chains of orbs'. They're not ghosts either;
>>they're the wriststrap of the camera dangling in front of the lens and
>>being illuminated by the flash.
>>
>>(Yes, I *know* you know what the orbs are. This post is for the benefit
>>of anyone who might be thinking "Woo, ghost evidence!!!111eleventyone)
>
> That's what I've always thought it was. I'm suprised how often they
> pop up though as 'evidence' of ghosts.
Don't be surprised. To quote somebody - "You believe what you want to
believe."
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|