You are here: Re: IMHO, Digital SECAM video is better than Analog NTSC video « Video Production « DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Re: IMHO, Digital SECAM video is better than Analog NTSC video

Posted by Joshua Zyber on 10/11/06 11:55

"Roderick Stewart" <escapetime@removethisbit.beeb.net> wrote in message
news:o5hpi2to5dorfla0nbbupu0objvu13n973@4ax.com...
> Any attempt to transfer material from one medium to another will
> always be a compromise. When showing 24fps film on 25fps video,
> matching the frame rates is only one of several possible compromises
> that can be implemented in order to make it work. It may be the one
> that is usually chosen, but that does not mean it is the only way it
> can be done. Doing it in other ways would involve different
> compromises, but the 4% speedup is not an inherent feature of the PAL
> system, just the compromise that most people seem to find the least
> annoying.

You may find the 4% speedup to be the "least annoying" compromise, but I
can assure you that people in other parts of the world find it to be the
most annoying.

What it comes down to is very simple. Neither PAL nor NTSC is perfect.
Both have compromises. Viewers raised watching PAL material since
childhood tend not to be bothered by the 4% speedup but are very
irritated by 3:2 pulldown. Likewise, viewers raised watching NTSC
material since childhood tend not to be bothered by 3:2 pulldown but are
very irritated by PAL speedup.

This is why both formats should be abandoned as quickly as possible so
that true High Definition can finally take over.

 

Navigation:

[Reply to this message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"