You are here: Re: IMHO, Digital SECAM video is better than Analog NTSC video « Video Production « DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Re: IMHO, Digital SECAM video is better than Analog NTSC video

Posted by Colin McFadyen on 10/12/06 14:10

In <v79si2l4t4fm9cspam9v43cv1f2ub9tvkn@4ax.com> Roderick Stewart <escapetime@removethisbit.beeb.net> writes:

>On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:28:40 -0700, JoeBloe
><joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
>>>>[...]
>>>>Go wipe that shit off your face dogbreath. The OP was talking about
>>>>the LONGER RUNNING TIME OF NTSC you TERMINAL FUCKHEAD
>>>>
>>>>HAHAHAHA to you, COCK HEAD
>>>
>>>Ah, I see an amiably conducted well-reasoned debate between
>>>intelligent rational-minded adults has sprung up again. Points of view
>>>expressed in such a manner really deserve everyone's fullest
>>>consideration, don't they.
>>>
>>>Rod.
>>
>>
>> Just about as much as some twit on Usenet with the same name as an
>>famous entertainer.
>>
>> Either your an idiot, if it is a mere nym, or your parents are, or
>>both. Good job, dipshit.

>Since you seem to be interested, it's my real name, given to me
>several decades before your "famous entertainer" had even been heard
>of. What has this got to do with the discussion of broadcast
>technology, and why do you think it gives you justification to direct
>juvenile insults at people you don't know?

>Rod.

Do a Google Groups search for Roy L Fuchs. It's his previous Usenet
moniker. You'll understand pretty quickly that this guy is definitely
disturbed and is probably off his meds.

 

Navigation:

[Reply to this message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"