|
|
Posted by Justin on 12/17/05 20:37
Goro wrote on [17 Dec 2005 10:11:28 -0800]:
>
> Justin wrote:
>> One-Shot Scot wrote on [Sat, 17 Dec 2005 06:57:44 -0800]:
>> > "P Pron" <paulatspambegone.pron@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
>> > news:40g0arF19cusaU1@individual.net...
>> >> Biz wrote:
>> >> || "Gary" <gary_w1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> || news:uql3q1hvmi2vb9u7ool405o43jpqdegg95@4ax.com...
>> >> ||| I downloaded the movie and it played fine on my PC. It was an .avi
>> >> ||| file, from the divx group.
>> >> |||
>> >> ||| I burned it onto a DVD using Nero Vision. The frames of the
>> >> ||| resulting film, when shown on my DVD player, rolled downward.
>> >> |||
>> >> ||| I burned again, this time with the highly recommended DivxToDVD2.
>> >> ||| Still rolling downwards.
>> >
>> >> |||
>> >> ||| Can anyone suggest what I could do to get a good burn of this film?
>> >> ||| It's one of my all-time favorites.
>> >> || You probably downloaded a PAL version...Being one of your all-time
>> >> || favorites and you wont buy the DVD, now thats pretty lame...
>> >>
>> >> Especially since, AFAIK, the PAL version isn't the recent restored
>> >> version, but is simply a reissue of the 60th Anniversary issue.....
>> >
>> >
>> > I was sure glad to finally get rid of my PAL-based Korean DVD of _King Kong_
>> > (1933). That 4% speed up in the audio throws everything off kilter. The
>> > dialog sounds like a bunch of chipmunks jabbering and the music becomes a
>> > burlesque of distortion.
>>
>> There was a Korean PAL version? Why wasn't it NTSC? Korea is an NTSC
>> country, after all.
>
> He said, "Korean PAL-BASED version", but mentions that it was an NTSC
> disc. So i'd assume that it was a poor conversion from PAL->NTSC that
Where does he mention it was NTSC?
> retained the 4% speedup. I'm not sure why this would be, though.
Seems odd, yes.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|