|
|
Posted by the dog from that film you saw on 10/19/06 21:06
"P Pron" <paulatspambegone.pron@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4pq656Fk06goU1@individual.net...
> || just get something with a digital video output - all the upscaling
> || talk is crap - your tv does that itself anyway - it's the digital
> || connection that improves the picture.
> ||
>
> Your repeatedly saying this doesn't make it true....
>
> I recently bought a Sony DVP-NS76H - recommended by Mr Tomassi - to go
> with my new Sony
> Bravia KDL40S2010 LCD tv, and whether it is digital connection
> vs.analogue, or the fact that there's a bay tree outside my window,
> there's absolutely no doubt that the picture appears substantially better
> using the player's built-in upscaling than that in the TV. It may be an
> illusion, but if it is, it's an illusion that everyone who has seen it has
> been fooled by.
> I think the player was 90, multi-region, from Hi-Fi Confidential nr
> Victoria Station, and I recommend it as strongly as Rolo did.
when you say that, i guess you're saying it looks better when you tell the
player to output a progressive signal rather than interlaced - think that
might have something to do with it too ?
remember - you can't invent extra detail that simply doesnt exist - you
could use a pc to upscale to a fantastic resolution of... say 3800x2040 if
you have a good quality large monitor- it still wouldnt offer any new
information.
--
Gareth.
A french man who wanted a castle threw his cat into a pond.
http://www.audioscrobbler.com/user/dsbmusic/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|