|
|
Posted by Martin Heffels on 11/01/06 14:27
On 1 Nov 2006 03:13:44 -0800, "carlmart" <carlmart@centroin.com.br> wrote:
>The problem is nobody really expected DV cameras (or HDV) being used
>for film production,
For DV-camera's that is true, but for HDV, this was known, as it is the
follow-up for the indie-filmmaker/doco-maker.
>Sony never thought there might be a large market for 24p cameras, both
>in DV and HDV, and they seem to have proven wrong. Or once again were
>just thinking of their upper series, forcing us into them.
That's just baloney to think that 24p makes your footage allof a sudden
look film-like. It's a lot more thingks which count to that, and those
things are usually the ones neglected first at a low-budget movie.
>Another thing that is changing is the lens option, which is soon to be
>removable for all cameras (not just JVC and Canon).
I know many people who bought a XL1 for that reason. But the amount of
poepl who actually have an additional lens, is almost zilch.
>I don't foresee any great advances in the audio area on these cameras,
>but I think we can compensate for that specific compromise in a
>different way. Like with small external portable recorders.
Yeah, that's fine, by all means, defeat the bad recording with dual-system
recording. Nothing wrong with that :-)
>Card flash recording is the way of the future, as the HVX200 is
>showing. For video is too expensive for now, which may get better soon.
Video is dirt-cheap nowadays. Do you really expect that a fully loaded
HD-camera will be your's for under a 1000? Don't think so.
chers
-martin-
--
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|