|
Posted by Biz on 12/21/05 05:55
SO are you trolling, or just not up on teh terms to describe this? If its
the 1933 original then shouldnt it be new transfer of the original King
Kong? ANd since the one is from 33 it is almost definitely acadedmy
ratio(1.37:1) since widescreen didnt come into wide use until about
1954....new King Kong is very misleading since a new movie just came out as
well...
"anthony" <anthonyjhcnospam@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1135140900.797163.71330@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Sorry all, I just checked and it does say it was shot in 1933 on a
> hand-cranked camera.
> Still don't know why they've put it out in pan-and-scan though.
> Apparently the ape isn't even real.
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|