Posted by jayembee on 12/21/05 07:07
"Biz" <spamoff@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> SO are you trolling, or just not up on teh terms to describe this? If its
> the 1933 original then shouldnt it be new transfer of the original King
> Kong? ANd since the one is from 33 it is almost definitely acadedmy
> ratio(1.37:1) since widescreen didnt come into wide use until about
> 1954....new King Kong is very misleading since a new movie just came out as
> well...
You might want to take out a loan and buy a sense of humor.
-- jayembee
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|