|
|
Posted by Jan Panteltje on 11/08/06 11:33
On a sunny day (7 Nov 2006 18:55:03 -0600) it happened "Toby"
<kymarto123@ybb.ne.jpp> wrote in <45512a74$0$15162$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com>:
>
>"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:eiqifl$9g1$1@news.datemas.de...
>> On a sunny day (7 Nov 2006 09:39:19 -0800) it happened "slugbug"
>> <fuzzhead72@yahoo.com> wrote in
>> <1162921159.229803.80920@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>>
>> Blue ray will win because it has more space, for example as a back
>> up medium for the PC.
>> It is all about space.
>
>The double-sided Blu-rays hold 50 gigs and the double-sided HD-DVDs hold 30
>gigs. Basically as long as you can fit a full-length movie in HD on either
>it is a viable medium.
>
>I can burn double-sided DVDs but perfer to burn to simple DVDs because the
>media are much cheaper. So after a certain point it is also about price, and
>convenience. Now that NEC has developed the technology to play either in the
>same player we will probably have both around until the next tech evolution.
>
>Toby
Agreed, but at some point people will want less compression and store
at the highest bitrate possible.
I remember I used to put 3 CDs in a box for one 2.1 GB movie.....
Binary split.
I still have these.... many hundreds.
I'd rather have less disks, it is 60% less disks for blue-ray.
Makes a lot of difference here on the shelves.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|