|
Posted by JerrySmith'sTightEnd on 11/09/06 14:02
"Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:B9z4h.7318$9v5.6346@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>
>
> --
> This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
>
> http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
> "Jim Gilliland" <usemylastname@cheerful.com> wrote in message
> news:4552a256$0$32406$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>> Randy Yates wrote:
>>
>>> S/PDIF is a single-wire interface that embeds the clock with the data.
>>> Because of this, problems with the interface that aren't serious
>>> enough to cause bit errors can still affect the sound by affecting the
>>> quality of the recovered clock. A PLL is used to recover the clock,
>>> and depending on the type of loop filter used in the PLL, input noise
>>> from cable degradations could introduce jitter into the digital clock
>>> and thus the reconstructed analog signal.
>>>
>>> How audible is it? That is a whole dissertation unto its own.
>>
>> Agreed. That's why I focused on his remarks about volume and bass.
>> Modern equipment does a pretty good job of recovering the clock, though.
>> It wasn't always true.
>>
>> I can't help but wonder if this guy isn't just a troll - it's hard to
>> imagine anyone believing this kind of garbage. Then again, there's an
>> awful lot of snake oil on the market. Someone must be buying it -
>> perhaps we've just discovered who that is. <g>
>>
>> I'd suggest a good double blind test, but I doubt that he'd accept the
>> results. He seems pretty fixed on his delusion.
>
> See son, you are biased without even giving it a try for yourself. I
> would not waste my time if it were not true. Try the shit(with cables of
> your choice) and see if you hear or see a difference. First, you have to
> know what you are dealing with before you try and figure out what you are
> supposed to hear or see.
Dang, getting a bit bitter? And now those who disagree are "son", a putdown
implying you are somehow older, wiser and more experienced? You have no
training in engineering or technical matters, but act like your 15 years of
using consumer electronics mkes you an expert.
>
> You say that I am delusional, but how come I see scratches on the film
> when I saw none with the generic? How come details are brighter, cleaner
> and earth materials look as they should? Don't knock it until you try it.
> What you have written is similar to a cocksucker who has never had pussy.
> You look at porn seeing pussy and imagining what it is like from reading
> about it and looking at it, but hands-on experience so very different from
> you 'education' from reading.
It seems you're getting back to talking about analog signal cables, which
can make a marginal diference. If you're talking about differences with
digital signal cables, you're retarded. Your continued fascination with
homo-erotic imagery reveals thingsabout your personality, none of which have
anything to do with the discussion. But hey, if you like that sort of
thing, there's nothng wrong with that.
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|