|
|
Posted by Guest on 11/09/06 19:32
--
This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
"JerrySmith'sTightEnd" <jhgfjh@hjhg.com> wrote in message
news:g6K4h.24089$TV3.17613@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote in message
> news:SmJ4h.86$ZT3.64@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>>
>> --
>> This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
>>
>> http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
>> "Richard" <rfeirste@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:12l6abk70q67n5a@corp.supernews.com...
>>>A tech guy from HDMI, LLC., has posted on the web that 1080p/60 is more
>>>demanding but that even low end cables up to 3 meters have been tested in
>>>their lab and have been more than satisfactory. For longer lengths they
>>>recommend better (but not expensive) cables or better yet, an HDMI
>>>booster.
>>>
>>> My cheap, but solid built, HDMI and DVI cables work just fine, but I
>>> have had no experience with 1080p/60.
>>>
>>> Richard.
>>>
>>
>> See, if you are happy, then so am I. However, I decided to take a risk
>> and the risk paid off. Again, only if you are what they call a
>> videophile will you will look for, expect and find a difference. The
>> average person who just sees a 'clear' picture will accept just that -
>> nothing more.
>
> And if you're a videofool you'll see nonexistent differences and brag
> about them to others.
>
Lol! In order for that to be valid, I would have had to show pictures so
that you can dismiss my claims. You know that there are still people out
there who can't see the difference between a DVD and HD picture?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|