|
|
Posted by Tom Stiller on 11/10/06 04:10
In article <tgO4h.108$Gp3.59@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com>,
"Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote:
> --
> This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
>
> http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
> "Tom Stiller" <tomstiller@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:tomstiller-A72927.17232609112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <gqedndhmAvLhPc7YnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
> > "Art Landy" <artlandy@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >> "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote in message
> >> news:5Su4h.2897$IR4.629@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
> >> >
> >> > http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
> >> > "David" <davey@home.net> wrote in message
> >> > news:8cidnbp8zKKn6M_YnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> >> "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote The AR outperformed the Monster
> >> >> to
> >> >> a very larger degree.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> As brilliant and renowned engineer Henry Kloss, et al, turn over in
> >> >> their grave . . .
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Ahh shit.
> >> >
> >> What a spicy thread! Can't resist putting in my two cents. The arguments
> >> seems to be the ususal "Subjectivists vs the Objectivists" type and both
> >> tend to adhere strongly to their positions. It is hard to convince a
> >> subjectivist that their experience is valid but flawed in the resulting
> >> conclusions. And itis hard to convince an Objectivists that the
> >> subjectivists aren't full of crap!
> >
> > No, the argument is about lack of understanding about digital
> > representation of analog signals and their subsequent over bit-serial
> > pathways. One side thinks that minor degradation of the digital signal
> > will be reflected in the reconstructed analog waveform (which his sharp
> > eyes and eyes can detect). The other side understands digital signal
> > processing, error correcting codes, and transmission lines.
> >
>
> The other side only understands what they have been told can only be done.
> Do you think that these cable companies(way over-priced ones and lower
> priced ones) just happen to make digital cables at a higher quality just for
> the hell of it? Do you think they just decided to make them without
> research and development? Get real.
No, I think they established a reputation with cables carrying analog
signals and are trying to transfer that expertise to the digital world
where it doesn't apply. They also stand to make a pot of money from the
unwitting dupes that will pay the price.
--
Tom Stiller
PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3
7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|