|
|
Posted by Tom Stiller on 11/10/06 13:45
In article <NWS4h.3462$IR4.2227@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>,
"Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:55:53 -0500, "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>You have a serious problem. Just do some testing for yourself.
> >
> > I hope you don't seriously think what you have done can be called
> > "testing", do you? That's one of the funniest parts of your posts!
>
> It is real world testing. I am not giving a magazine review man. I had one
> HDMI cable and bought another. I see the difference and my test is
> complete. I like the results of the non-pack in cable.
Your visual acuity is not the issue here, it's your absurd assertion
that any difference you might detect can be attributed to the "quality"
of the HDMI cable linking the source to the destination.
Your position that digital data reproduction and transmission suffers
from all the same problems as analog techniques makes as much sense as a
proposal for putting a satellite in polar geosynchronous orbit.
You can continue to portray the village idiot to the amusement of those
of us willing to invest the time, or you can admit (at least to
yourself) that you don't know jack-shit about digital technology and do
something to correct that deficiency.
--
Tom Stiller
PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3
7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|