|
Posted by JerrySmith'sTightEnd on 11/10/06 16:51
"Leonard Caillouet" <no@noway.com> wrote in message
news:Ei15h.13656$GU5.11159@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Jim Gilliland" <usemylastname@cheerful.com> wrote in message
> news:45547afc$0$17686$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>> Art Landy wrote:
>>> What a spicy thread! Can't resist putting in my two cents. The
>>> arguments seems to be the ususal "Subjectivists vs the Objectivists"
>>> type and both tend to adhere strongly to their positions. It is hard to
>>> convince a subjectivist that their experience is valid but flawed in the
>>> resulting conclusions. And itis hard to convince an Objectivists that
>>> the subjectivists aren't full of crap!
>>
>> I wish that were true. The single "subjectivist" here doesn't seem to be
>> able to support his position at all.
>>
>> I could easily quote you many of the arguments of the subjectivists, even
>> though I certainly fall more into the objectivist camp. The problem here
>> is that the original poster can't even put together a coherent discussion
>> of the topic. It appears that we are (as the saying goes) "engaging in a
>> battle of wits with an unarmed man".
>
> What is amazing is that so much effort has been devoted to this thread.
>
> Leonard
It's fun!
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
> It has removed 16978 spam emails to date.
> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
> Try SPAMfighter for free now!
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|