|
Posted by Guest on 11/10/06 19:54
--
This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
"Jim Gilliland" <usemylastname@cheerful.com> wrote in message
news:45547afc$0$17686$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
> Art Landy wrote:
>> What a spicy thread! Can't resist putting in my two cents. The arguments
>> seems to be the ususal "Subjectivists vs the Objectivists" type and both
>> tend to adhere strongly to their positions. It is hard to convince a
>> subjectivist that their experience is valid but flawed in the resulting
>> conclusions. And itis hard to convince an Objectivists that the
>> subjectivists aren't full of crap!
>
> I wish that were true. The single "subjectivist" here doesn't seem to be
> able to support his position at all.
>
> I could easily quote you many of the arguments of the subjectivists, even
> though I certainly fall more into the objectivist camp. The problem here
> is that the original poster can't even put together a coherent discussion
> of the topic. It appears that we are (as the saying goes) "engaging in a
> battle of wits with an unarmed man".
That's what your girl might say when you take off your pants!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|