|
|
Posted by Sam Rouse on 12/22/05 09:36
In article <43aa5d9f.1084406@news-server.houston.rr.com>, spam@uce.gov (Bob)
wrote:
> On 21 Dec 2005 15:45:13 -0800, alcarm1964@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> >I've gotten 162 films so far in 11.5 months,
> >which I think is pretty good.
>
> Actually that's pretty bad.
>
> 11.5 months is 50 weeks. 162 / 50 = 3 1/4 DVDs per week.
It's about 14 per month, which at $18/month is about $1.29 per DVD.
> You should be getting at least 6 per week, which would be 300 per year
> accounting for holidays.
Forget about what you "should" get based on optimum turnaround. Where do you
complainers get a better deal than $1.29 per disc, that has anywhere near
Netflix's selection and requires going no further than your mailbox? If you
have an inside track on a real competitor, I'd like to hear about it.
(Availability of a handful of current mainstream releases and seven copies of
Pumpkinhead 3 coated with pizza grease, popsicle drips and bong water at the
nearest grocery store for $0.79 each on coupon day isn't much competition.)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|