|
|
Posted by wdoe999 on 11/15/06 05:49
Thanks - I've seen so much hype about progressive scan that it is good
to see (in the article you referenced) that people are questioning some
of the crazy reasons that are given for the superiority of progressive
scan.
Jukka Aho wrote:
> wdoe999@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > I'm try to decipher why progressive scan video is considered better
> > then interlaced.
>
> 1) Non-interlaced video is easier to deal with computers,
> image-processing algorithms, and compression algorithms. (And, they're
> easier to get your head around, if you're not very bright. Some computer
> programmers who try to make video processing products, aren't.)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|