|
|
Posted by Max on 11/17/06 21:51
"Gunther Gloop" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:4s6o4nFu87gdU1@mid.individual.net...
> Colin Mckechnie wrote:
>>>> On the whole, I really enjoyed it. Quite unrealistic (as every
>>>> James Bond film is), but not at all ridiculous (as most James Bond
>>>> films have been).
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the review, sounds very encouraging - can I ask what is
>>> your favourite Bond film prior to this one?
>>>
>>
>> I seen it last night thought it was crap, Craig is no bond IMO
>> As for Best bond liked all the connery films he IS bond however
>> funnily enough my fav bond ever was goldeneye
>
> Horses for courses. I thought Pierce Brosnan was probably the best thing
> about the Bond movies he was in, but everything else -the scripts, the
> gadgets, the hype, the baddies, the blanderisations all failed to take
> hold on any level.
> I don't think I could even name the last 4 Bond movies -they're all
> interchangeable with rubbish "Bondian" titles.
>
> Daniel Craig is more like Connery than anyone since, although this Bond is
> learning the ropes as he goes along (it's his first mission after becoming
> a double-O).
>
> ...I forgot to say in the last post -if I had to make a comparison, I'd
> say Casino Royale is like a mix between On Her Majesty's Secret Service
> and Dr. No... with a lot more action. And without anyone looking to take
> over the world.
> It also makes the most-use of mobile phones I've seen in any film in
> living memory.
>
Sony Erikson by any chance?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|