|
|
Posted by Max on 11/17/06 23:38
"Gunther Gloop" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:4s6ovmFufv9gU1@mid.individual.net...
> Max wrote:
>> "Gunther Gloop" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
>> news:4s6o4nFu87gdU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> Colin Mckechnie wrote:
>>>>>> On the whole, I really enjoyed it. Quite unrealistic (as every
>>>>>> James Bond film is), but not at all ridiculous (as most James Bond
>>>>>> films have been).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the review, sounds very encouraging - can I ask what is
>>>>> your favourite Bond film prior to this one?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I seen it last night thought it was crap, Craig is no bond IMO
>>>> As for Best bond liked all the connery films he IS bond however
>>>> funnily enough my fav bond ever was goldeneye
>>>
>>> Horses for courses. I thought Pierce Brosnan was probably the best
>>> thing about the Bond movies he was in, but everything else -the
>>> scripts, the gadgets, the hype, the baddies, the blanderisations all
>>> failed to take hold on any level.
>>> I don't think I could even name the last 4 Bond movies -they're all
>>> interchangeable with rubbish "Bondian" titles.
>>>
>>> Daniel Craig is more like Connery than anyone since, although this
>>> Bond is learning the ropes as he goes along (it's his first mission
>>> after becoming a double-O).
>>>
>>> ...I forgot to say in the last post -if I had to make a comparison,
>>> I'd say Casino Royale is like a mix between On Her Majesty's Secret
>>> Service and Dr. No... with a lot more action. And without anyone
>>> looking to take over the world.
>>> It also makes the most-use of mobile phones I've seen in any film in
>>> living memory.
>>
>> Sony Erikson by any chance?
>
> Yup. There's also Sony Vaio laptops around the place.
> Blatant product placements, but not as gratuitous as I've seen in clips
> from the Brosnan ones.
Perrier comes to mind
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|