|
|
Posted by Martin Heffels on 11/25/06 16:07
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:16:42 -0500, "Smarty" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote:
>It did exactly as John published, capturing low light images
>very well, but the motion artifacts were just awful. This defect was not
>even slightly evident from his comparison pictures.
Wouldn't that be slow-shutter, to improve sensitivity?
>I guess I should not be especially surprised that Sony and others have made
>light sensitivity, clean motion images, and low price the basic 3
>discriminants for the consumer. You can pick any 2.....but you can't get all
>3 at once!
LOL. Very true.
-m-
--
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|