|
|
Posted by GoCycle on 11/25/06 22:59
YES....without a doubt. The 5100 is better in low light......much better.
Lou Bruno
<edwin@gorpproductions.com> wrote in message
news:1164136255.932311.168400@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Hi Mike,
>
> Do you think the SD of the GY-DV5100 is better looking then down
> converted HD of the GY-HD110?
>
> Edwin
>
>
> Mike Kujbida wrote:
>> edwin@gorpproductions.com wrote:
>> > Hi Guys,
>> >
>> > We're doing a documentary in Nepal on a charity organization called
>> > FOST and we need to purchase some video equipment.
>> >
>> > My questions to you is: What would choose if your budget is around
>> > 6000 dollar for a camcorder and you would want the best quality?
>> > GY-DV5100U or GY-HD110.
>> >
>> > I have macbook intel core duo 2 mghz and need to edit on this machine.
>> > I don't know about or look for HD and down conversion......
>> >
>> > I'm really looking forward to your recommendations.
>> >
>> > THANKS,
>> >
>> > Edwin
>>
>>
>> While the GY-HD110 has some very nice features(true 24 frame 720P), if
>> you've never shot or edited HDV before, I'd suggest sticking with the
>> GY-DV5100U. I use a pair of it's predecessor, the 550U at the college I
>> work for and have been quite happy with them. One suggestion is to, if
>> the
>> budget allows for it, upgrade the stock lens to something better.
>>
>> Mike
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|