|  | Posted by MI5-Victim on 11/28/06 15:42 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--= my response to the harassment -=
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 
 My first reaction in 1990/91 was to assume that if I broke contact then
 they would not be able to follow and would lose interest. So I did the
 things that have been suggested by other people; I sold my television,
 stopped listening to the radio and tried to withdraw away from the sources
 of abuse as much as possible. I reasoned that they must have more important
 things to deal with and that normal people would simply leave me alone if
 it were made difficult for them to continue their harassment.
 
 I reckoned without the sheer vindictiveness of the abusers. They did not
 let up but instead "got to" people around me, mainly people at work, to do
 their dirty work for them. I went to see my GP, who refused to believe what
 he was being told, and refused to direct me on to anyone who could be of
 practical assistance. It was not until three years had passed that the GP
 admitted the matter was outside his competence and suggested going to the
 police.
 
 In the summer of 1994 we called in counter-surveillance experts from a
 private detective agency to sweep our house and telephone for bugging
 devices. They conducted a thorough search and found nothing; but as noted
 above, since the existence of surveillance was being forced in my face by
 the harassers, you would expect them to have taken the possibility of a
 counter-surveillance sweep into account when planning the type of devices
 to be employed.
 
 In Easter 1995 I made a complaint to my local Police station in London, but
 the police have not expressed any intention to do anything about the
 continuing harassment ("we're not saying it's happening and we're not
 saying it isn't happening" were the words used). I think the officer I
 spoke to at Easter wasn't aware of it happening, although other members of
 the police force obviously do know.
 
 From April 1995 until the present time the matter has been discussed in a
 lot of detail on the Usenet (Internet) "uk.misc" newsgroup. That discussion
 has given birth to the article which you are now reading. My hopes in
 posting to Usenet were that wider publicizing would discourage the security
 services from continuing their harassment, and "draw people out" into
 concurring with the truth of what was being said. Neither of those have
 followed, but the discussion has served a purpose in allowing this
 structured report to be created.
 
 279
 
 
 --
 Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
  Navigation: [Reply to this message] |