|
|
Posted by Goro on 10/04/68 11:35
kaboom wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 01:57:18 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs
> <roylfuchs@ufargingicehole.org> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:10:38 GMT, kaboomicus@NOSPAMyahoo.com (kaboom)
> >Gave us:
> >
> >>**Dang tootin, you might as well purchase Coby products instead.
> >
> >
> > OMG, Sony is bad but they aren't that bad. I bought one of those DVD
> >players, and it would lose the sound part way through the flic ALL the
> >time! Without a resume feature, I would have to stop play, restart,
> >wait thru the menus, and then skip to the viewing point.
> >
> > It was supposed to be a prog scan, with 5.1 outs. It had 'em but it
> >didn't work worth a shit. Sony can't be that bad.
>
> **Hi Roy :) Sony is probably better than Coby, for sure. However, Sony
> used to be synonymous with high quality. I'm more offended at their
> actions, i.e., poor engineering, build quality, and, worse, this DRM
> garbage. I expect nothing from Coby, but I expect a lot better from
> Sony. It's shameful.
>
> kaboomie
It used to be that you could buy cheap stuff or step up to Sony. Now,
Sony has descended to the ranks of cheap crap along with everyone else.
There's little reason to choose Sony over (say) Samsung or Panasonic
these days.
-goro-
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|