|
|
Posted by Doc on 12/05/06 19:46
"Mike Rivers" <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote in message
news:1165339746.264613.203410@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> Doc wrote:
>
> > It occurred to me this makes no sense. If she would only do one take
> > and go with whatever the results were, she might as well do it live,
> > which I believe she did.
>
> Well, I suppose that if the ProTools system crashed while she was doing
> her one take, or if she forgot the words (which of course she wouldn't
> do because she's a real pro) she'd do another take.
What I got from the way it was worded is since that the the kind of possible
but unlikey snafu you listed wasn't an issue, when doing this alleged
pre-recorded track she didn't care to do it more than once.
> But having a usable
> take in the can means that she doesn't have to worry about technical
> screwups over which she or "her people" have no control when it comes
> time to do her public appearance.
Any time there's gear involved there's the potential for a glitch, whether
it's her or memorex. I dunno, if it were me, being a little off pitch in a
couple of spots or a little static or even having the mic die altogether
wouldn't be as bad as risking an Ashlee Simpson-esque episode, especially
for someone like CA who has a rep as a very capable singer.
And again, her mic *was* shown to be live. Why do that if she's not using it
and risk various issues there? That they would A) go to the trouble setting
it up solely for the purpose of B) depending on someone to pot it up at the
very end just so she could whisper 2 words "Thanks Sasha" seems somewhat
implausible.
> I'm still waiting to hear from someone who was at the event. I guess
> nobody was. So who cares?
Given the number of posts in the thread, including several from you
apparently it's piqued the interest of many.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|