Posted by Spex on 12/06/06 16:17

charles wrote:
> In article <OPednbw8wJMDUuvYnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@golden.net>,
> Bill <trash@christian-horizons.org> wrote:
>> It would be justified if the event was packaged and advertised as "lip
>> synch performance by blah blah--" Come and see blah blah pretend to
>> sing in front of a live audience. Applaud the recording device! Ask
>> the computer come out for an encore!
>
>> People (or sponsors) pay a very good dollar to see live "performances".
>> I honestly don't think it imposes too onerous a burden on a performer
>> to actually perform the song.
>
> It obviously depends on the performer/performance, but many record tracks
> are heavily processed out of real time. If a "live" performance was given,
> the fans wouldn't heard anything that they expect from the records they've
> heard. the might then deamnd their money back ;-(
>
What drivel.

• Next in forum: Re: Youtube copyright infringements are not all bad for the copyright holders?
• Prev in forum: Re: set audio level on modulator
• Thread view: Re: Christina Aguilera at Rockefeller Tree Lighting sung live?

[Reply to this message]