|
|
Posted by DB_Story on 12/10/06 07:48
"Don M." <newsreader@nospam4fineartsnospam.com> wrote in message
news:9fidneQA19Kx6ebYnZ2dnUVZ_vOlnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "Terry" <kilowatt@charter.net> wrote in message
> news:1165672434.822283.230880@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> > I keep a lookout for pre 1990 adult films. It is rare that you find
> > more than one version of the same title. Almost every time you do find
> > a source, you will be 100 in the Q.
> >
> > These guys just popped up.
> >
> > http://i11.tinypic.com/4fuxct3.jpg
> >
> > Anyone know if I am right to suspect this?
> >
> ===========
>
> Yes, Kilo. Transfer status in Whois being different from status on
transfer pane, at
> least in regards to total slots open, should raise a flag. I'd bet all
those users
> "share" from a similar pathname and all have 3000 files.
>
>
> Don
In addition, all of them having *exactly* the same filename, although with
different lengths, defies coincidence.
But why would someone be spoofing such an otherwise obscure item? That
seems more than a little strange.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|