|
|
Posted by Stroller on 12/11/06 20:49
fwibbler wrote:
> Stroller <stroller@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> ...
> Assuming it was this set (and not some other DVD I was watching recently, it
> seemed to me (because I'm a picky sod and tend to notice these things) that
> the PAL version is a just a simple conversion of the NTSC version, thus it
> doesn't benefit from the extra detail and clarity that the PAL format is
> capable of (576 lines compared to 480 lines NTSC) (in fact, it does indeed
> lose a tiny bit of detail in the conversion as you have noticed).
I see. Thanks for your help - that's exactly what I wanted to know.
> That said, I'd still prefer the PAL format version as it doesn't have the
> horrible motion judder of the NTSC format.
Sorry - can you clarify this, please? Is motion judder a characteristic of
NTSC?
Stroller.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|