|
Posted by Justin Cole on 12/12/06 21:25
"kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote in message
news:wLqdncHpIcX8jOLYRVnyugA@giganews.com...
> "Justin Cole" <jus.coleNO@S-P-A-Mntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:rZDfh.5738$z01.5723@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net...
>> "fwibbler" <thedoctor@thedeathzone.free-online.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:gemini.ja4tug0018mdf0204.thedoctor@thedeathzone.free-online.co.uk...
>> However, 3:2 pulldown removal on a non-interlaced display can almost
>> fully
>> remove the problem.
> No it doesn't. The 2:3 pulldown sequence is added back in after the
> deinterlacing.
It was keeping it simple. Agreed, the net effect is that the '3 to 2'
shuddering is still there but less pronounced... The zipper effect of
stitching different original frames into an interlaced frame is lost! :)
Justin.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|