| Posted by STINGER on 12/31/06 16:46 
lets try this...he was asking why he could only get 1 hr (the highest setting) on a dvd
 where a commercial dvd can get 4 hr. and the answer is because of dual layer
 ....
 if his recorder supported dual layer he could get 4 hr (dvd quality ) as
 well
 
 rmember he said ...
 
 > >>Can someone explain to me why I can only record around one hours worth
 > >>of TV on my Sony DVD recorder on the highest quality setting?  I can
 > >>buy a DVD box set of a TV series (24 for example) on which they manage
 > >>to fit 4 episodes in high quality dolby 5.1 surround sound.
 
 i am assuming that the 1 hr setting is higher that dvd quality and the 2 hr
 is dvd
 quality and supposedly 3 or 4 up to 6 hr is lower than dvd quality. but that
 is where
 the rest of the answers dwelled into instead of his actual question ...
 
 "Quanta" <none@none.NET> wrote in message
 news:em73eq$qie$1@zinnia.noc.ucla.edu...
 >
 > "Citizen Bob" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
 > news:45855835.376795343@news-server.houston.rr.com...
 > > On 16 Dec 2006 16:05:23 -0800, "AndrewD" <andrew_duerden@excite.com>
 > > wrote:
 > >
 > >>Can someone explain to me why I can only record around one hours worth
 > >>of TV on my Sony DVD recorder on the highest quality setting?  I can
 > >>buy a DVD box set of a TV series (24 for example) on which they manage
 > >>to fit 4 episodes in high quality dolby 5.1 surround sound.
 > >
 > >>Why can I not fit the same amount of data onto a normal recordable DVD?
 > >
 > > You can if you use the same resolution, which is 2-hour.
 > >
 > > The 1-hour setting is higher than standard DVD.
 > >
 > > The MPEG-2 chips in the newest DVDRs do a fantastic job even at
 > > 6-hour. You can convince yourself of that by making a series of test
 > > recordings and checking them with GSpot. For example on one of my
 > > DVDRs I can get 720x480 at 1000 Kb/s from 6-hour resolution. That's
 > > good enough for a 19" viewscreen and not bad for even a 62" DLP.
 >
 >
 > What DVDRs have these chips?  I want one.
 >
 >
  Navigation: [Reply to this message] |