|
|
Posted by Alpha on 01/01/07 22:53
"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:l91jp2h9abvhfm5it3bpqtqs4q5qhvlbmm@4ax.com...
> On 1 Jan 2007 03:30:46 -0800, Rexunrex@yahoo.com Gave us:
>
>>
>>Aaron J. Bossig wrote:
>>
>>> The flaw in that comparison is that DVD did, in fact, replace VHS.
>>> Therefore, nothing prevents DVD from being replaced by someone else.
>>
>>For most people DVD is sufficient. If they don't buy the new
>>display, or have the ability to play HDDVD/Bluray on their computer,
>>they will not even be familiar with any improvement that high def
>>offers. No familiarity means no purchases.
>>
>>Another factor that will prevent adoption is that most people
>>already have an investment in DVDs. Who knows what the
>>average # of DVDs per person or household is, but I know
>>people who have 100. And of course libraries and video stores
>>have 1000s. So if you tell those people they're going to have
>>to put out another $2000 or $20,000 respecitvely for new
>>discs and they will balk. Not to mention the need to buy
>>a high-def screen, the drive, and maybe a video card.
>
>
> It's not a "drive", dumbass. Get out of your PC centric fucktard
> mentality.
>
> The format was meant for home theater use. It is a DISC PLAYER.
>
> The PLAYER pumps the DISPLAY just fine. No video card needed.
>
> Oh, and what do ya know... ALL of my DVD library ALSO plays, and is
> even resolution upconverted perfectly.
>
> Get a clue, boy, you are miles behind the rest of the world.
You are an idiot beyond compare!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|