|
|
Posted by shauny on 01/04/07 10:11
MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk wrote:
> Counter-surveillance sweep by Nationwide Investigations Group
>
> In July 1994 the private detective agency Nationwide Investigations Group conducted an electronic counter-surveillance
> sweep of my parents' home in London. They checked for radio transmitter devices, and tested the telephone line for attached
> bugs. They found nothing.
>
> I am afraid that I was unsurprised at their not finding any evidence of covert surveillance. It had been made very clear to me,
> particularly during 1990-92, that audio, and almost certainly video, surveillance of my parents' home was taking place. But this
> would not have been made quite so obvious unless the persecutors were confident of their apparatus being undetectable using the
> technology the police, or a private agency like Nationwide, would be using.
>
> I don't know very much about the surveillance technology that has been used against me, but I understand that devices can be built
> which switch off on receiving a coded command, and may switch on again after a counter- surveillance sweep has completed; that devices
> may rapidly alter the frequency of transmission, "frequency-hopping" devices which presumably cannot be detected in a sequential scan
> of the sort employed by Nationwide; and of course "probe" microphones can be inserted "through-the-wall", although I hesitate to
> believe our neighbours would permit this.
>
> We paid Nationwide £411.25 (including VAT) for the surveillance sweep, which took them about an hour and a half to complete, using
> a "Professional 5000 multi-scanner, CCL UHF scanner and Guideline telephone tap detector." As I said above, I don't know very much
> about these things, so I can't comment on the capabilities or otherwise of this equipment. But clearly the "watchers" are using
> technology which in 1994 was beyond the detection capabilities of a good private detective agency.
>
> 170
>
Well someones a little bit paranoid lol
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|