|
|
Posted by John on 12/30/05 21:27
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:25:29 GMT, A strange species called "Biz"
<spamoff@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>It depends on your source...if its standard tv, then its almost definitely
>an interlaced source....
>"John" <qak@ttack.com> wrote in message
>news:5ht8r1506jpd4bg7ifalak6l8araer6f0l@4ax.com...
>> When I am fixing the recording presets in my ATI tuner, it has a
>> section on de-interlacing options.
>>
>> I have the choice of progressive source, de-interlaced, and encode
>> interlaced. Which do I choose and what are the differences?
>>
>> I am fixing the full resolution recording preset so the audio is
>> 48,000 and compliant with DVD as the ATI software I have it all seems
>> to be at 44,100.
>>
>> Thanks for your help on this
>>
>> John
It is ATI software that is an analogue TV tuner, but the feed comes
from a Sony Digital (Sky TV) box. The audio comes via optical input. I
am guessing this would still be classed as a standard TV source being
analogue?
What are the differences between the three different options? And when
is it best to use each one?
Cheers
John
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|