|
|
Posted by Pogonip on 01/07/07 04:06
Spehro Pefhany wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:54:20 -0600, the renowned Bertha
> <bertha@yetta.net> wrote:
>
>
>>On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 01:33:56 GMT, john339077353@cs.com
>><john339077353@cs.com> defied the laws of time and space to say:
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 18:26:22 -0700, "Lumpy"
>>><lumpy@digitalcartography.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I think a flat mailer is not appropriate for
>>>>shipping CD's or DVD's unless they are surrounded
>>>>by some seriously stiff cardboard and padding.
>>>>Maybe a CD inside a CD mailer and then in the flat.
>>>>Wouldn't take much of a blow to the flat to break
>>>>the jewel case and or the disc.
>>>
>>>What the fuck do you know?
>>>
>>> nothing
>>> shut the fuck up
>>
>>Wow, what an impressive rebuttal. Your command of the facts has totally
>>convinced me of your point of view.
>>
>>-Bertha
>
>
> The disks are made of polycarbonate and are unlikely to break. The
> jewel cases are made of "crystal" polystyrene and are very easy to
> break. Izod impact strength of PC is about 4:1 better then GPPS,
> technically speaking. I get expensive DVDs mailed in simple cardboard
> mailers (no case, just a paper sleeve) often, and none has arrived
> broken. Stacking two or more disks without jewel cases increases the
> odds even further.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Spehro Pefhany
I dunno. Seems like everytime the mail carrier folds an envelope with a
CD in it to get it into the mailbox, it breaks.
--
Joanne
stitches @ singerlady.reno.nv.us.earth.milky-way.com
http://members.tripod.com/~bernardschopen/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|