|
|
Posted by NewB on 01/11/07 05:11
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:57:57 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
>
>"Nu B" <noob@New.B.N0t> wrote in message
>news:sc86q2t64uba3et9rjpgmbl85eot040d5g@4ax.com...
>> I have been running winmx v3.54b4 for some time on a new 3GB Intel
>> with 1GB RAM, running win mce 2005 sp2
>>
>> Running Taskinfo and ABPmon system monitors which are alerting me to
>> the overloads.
>>
>> I have less than 200 files shared on this system.
>>
>> about 10 days ago, I allowed several windows updates [I rejected IE v7
>> and WMP 11] - maybe coincidental.
>>
>> On the first winmx restart after update and reboot, I got alerts that
>> the system GDI objects were too high. I checked and winmx was using
>> about 6500. I rebooted and that hasn't happened since.
>>
>> Then, after running several hours, I got an alert that virtual memory
>> was overloaded. I peeked and winmx was using 1.3GB of memory. I
>> killed it and restarted. On restart, it was using only about 200mB.
>> Now, after less than 7 hours, it is using over 600MB and if it means
>> anything, it has done 3.3 million writes. [I am not downloading any
>> files, only uploading to others, with usually 2 or 3 slots active]
>>
>> Just now I got more warnings of Low Virtual Memory. Doing a flush
>> cleared a few resources, but Vrt MEM is still about 65%, RAM is 56%
>>
>> Anyone else experiencing anything like this? Any ideas on identifying
>> the culprit, assuming it was some recent M$ update patch?
>
>When that happenes, open Windows Task Manager and see if My Computer isn't
>pegging out at like 90+ CPU useage. If it is, you likely have some bad
>incomplete files. Also, go to http://winmxwoirld.com and ask there.
>
No incomplates. I am not using winmx to download, only as a file
server to upload and to park in a chatroom.
The CPU is not excessive, currently about 5% total with winmx using
2.88% average over a long period.
My graphs for Virtual MEM [48%] and RAM usage [90%] are showing
slopes, with a gradual rise over the hours. When winmx started, it
was using about 93MB of memory. Now, after running for just a little
over 2 hours, it is 'using' over 350MB.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|