You are here: Re: SD or HD? Interlaced or Progressive? « Video Production « DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Re: SD or HD? Interlaced or Progressive?

Posted by azl3chn3rs on 01/11/07 23:02

Spex wrote:
> azl3chn3rs@gmail.com wrote:
> > Spex wrote:

> >
> None truth to those rumours at all. In fact if you intend to shoot HD
> and then output to SD DVD you will get a better quality product
> especially if you use graphics. You will not be limited by the 4:1:1 or
> 4:2:0 colour sampling of DV material i.e. the total shafting of graphics.
>
> A well shot HDV project down-converted to SD DVD can approach the
> quality of the typical hollywood DVD in a way that shooting DV and going
> to DVD never can match.
>
> Seriously check out the HVR-V1. Utterly gorgeous image - the best HDV
> camcorder yet in my opinion.

Spex,

What kind of graphics are you referring to - titles, still images,
etc.? I need to get ramped up on color sampling because I have not
taken the time to understand the nomenclature of 4:1:1, 4:2:0, etc.

It's really good to hear that you can shoot in HD but down-convert to
SD without any problems. I'd read somewhere that the down-converted
video was not as sharp as if you'd shot in SD to begin with. The
HVR-V1 is a bit more than I wanted to spend but I suspect that prices
will continue to decrease as new units come on line.

Thanks for the good info.

Mike

 

Navigation:

[Reply to this message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"