|
|
Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 12/31/05 21:37
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:21:33 GMT, spam@uce.gov (Bob) Gave us:
>On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:41:23 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs
><roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>
>> Your posts claimed that everything from a "standard CD-R, to your
>>famed "better brand" Fuji DVD recordables were that way.
>
>I said I was talking about the use of acetone specifically on the Fuji
>MIJ DVD YUDEN000 T02 sikver lacquer discs. I never said anything about
>any other discs.
>
>> The fact is, you simply refused to accept the facts from those that
>>did know.
>
>You are not in possession of the correct facts.
Oh, I most certainly do know the facts.
> And when Howell posted
>that diagram, I then broke a Fuji disc and it is made of two
>polycarbonate sheets of the same apparent thickness, with the active
>material in the middle.
The site depicts mass produced, STAMPED discs, which ARE laminated.
A burnable disc is NOT made the way that site shows.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_disc
Scroll down to "Physical Details"
It resides just under the lacquer top coat, and THAT is the very
same lacquer that even your Fuji disc refers to.
GET A CLUE.
> Then I admitted I was wrong only about the
>active material being on the bottom.
NOW, you need to admit, even further, the err of your guesswork.
I NEVER guessed, as I knew the facts already, even BEFORE I hunted
it up on google.
>
>You do not want to admit that your wrong about the active material
>being on the top. You confused a CD with a DVD.
You are wrong. A recordable DVD has the same physical nomenclature.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|