Posted by M.I.5 on 01/18/07 08:10
"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:gadsq2hb428nih9u7i7ndfcmhjl8btfp35@4ax.com...
> Joshua Zyber wrote:
>
>>That you insist on this yet also believe
>>that progressive scan offers no benefit over interlace is borderline
>>insane.
>
> Did he really claim that? This "M.I.5" idiot is about as clueless as
> they come, ain't he?
>
You are quoting out of context. On a CRT display it provides a very obvious
benefit even for interlaced source material. On a plasma display it also
provides a very obvious benefit even for interlaced source material.
However, on an LCD display, it makes no difference *for interlaced source
material* (we were specifically discussing DVD at the time) - which is what
I said. There is no way that conversion to progressive can alter the fact
that the odd lines occur in a time frame one fiftieth of a second earlier
than the even lines.
Of course for progressive source material then once again there is an
obvious benefit - but we weren't discussing that context.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|