|
|
Posted by *Neck & Red* on 02/18/07 02:50
<Boris> wrote in message
news:QomdnVdk-csEL0rYnZ2dnUVZ_o2vnZ2d@comcast.com...
> "*Neck & Red*" <nekkid@spam.com> wrote in
> news:INNBh.2698$x74.2666@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net:
>
>>
>> <Boris> wrote in message
>> news:HoudndjPP7jqEUrYnZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hmmm...does seem common:
>>> http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=151956
>>>
>>> I burned over 400 CDs last year while converting vinyl albums to CD.
>>> I'd burn 5 to 10 at a sitting, and joked to myself that I was
>>> probably going to burn out the CD burner. Maybe this sort of started
>>> it's demise.
>>>
>>> Any Pioneer recommendations? I don't particularly need speed, just
>>> consistent, quality burns, both CD and DVD.
>>
>> I'm not sure what the current Pioneer model is, maybe the 111 or 112?
>> I have the 109's and have been using Pioneer since the 105's I think!
>>
>>
> I was just looking at the Pioneer 111 on newegg. One of the reviewers
> said it has Riplock. I do a lot of backing up of my DVDs. Doesn't
> Riplock slow the ripping down to 1/2x?
Maybe..I really don't know. BUT..what's more important...a quality burn or
saving a minute on the rip time?
I don't know if my 109's have the riplock thing, but they rip DVD's like
nobodys business :)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|