|
|
Posted by Smarty on 02/20/07 03:24
Mike,
It's worth noting that Spex was unaware of this alternative solution to the
Parallels hard disk problem, and never made any mention of it whatsoever in
any of his several previous replies and comments on this limitation. It is
even more notable that his reply below, that I am "now getting to where we
are" suggests that I somehow had overlooked some capability or feature that
he was already aware of. It really got me laughing out loud. It kinda
reminds me of the grandkids playing the game "I know something you don't
know but I'm not going to tell you" except in Spex case, he didn't
know......
Smarty
"Spex" <No.spam@ta.com> wrote in message
news:45da26bb$0$8731$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
> Smarty wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>> One very important discovery I just learned this morning..........
>>
>> The installation of an optional Parallels Tool from their installer CD
>> adds a so-called "Shared Folder" capability which does allow Parallels to
>> see selected internal hard drives / content via normal Windows file
>> sharing. I have yet to explore and learn how useful and capable this
>> optional software truly is, but my first impression after installing and
>> using it is that it overcomes one of my two major objections to
>> Parallels, namely, the limitation of only having a virtual, small, slow
>> hard disk. The speed / performance of Parallels is still an issue for
>> video work.
>>
> Now he seems to be getting to where we are.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|