|
|
Posted by Smarty on 02/20/07 21:42
Spex,
You really are coming totally unglued.
Clearly facts and logic escape you, at least in the matter we have been
discussing.
I am sorry if I have offended you, or others on this newsgroup.
Mike and others raise legitimate questions before spending $4000 on MacPro
Quad Xeon level systems, and helping people like him is something I enjoy
doing. Particularly if others create a misleading impression that something
should work well when in fact it does not.
My original point that Parallels and virtualization are for all practical
purposes useless for doing most if not all video work still holds, and your
eventual acknowledgement that Parallels is merely a good solution for
running Word, Excel, and other office programs is a pathetic reply on a
newsgroup devoted to video production.
Smarty
"Spex" <No.spam@ta.com> wrote in message
news:45db657b$0$8739$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
> Smartseyhole
>
> You are just another idiot in a long line of idiots that mong around on
> newsgroups pontificating about things that you know little about trying to
> boost your own paltry self esteem. You spend so much time doing it that
> it really hurts when someone pulls you up for making a tit of yourself.
> Then you get all testy.
>
> Parallels ain't no good for video work..boohoo.. Do you homework better
> before spouting your ill informed guff next time. Shock fuckin horror
> Parallels provided tech support for their product not me. What ever next?
> You really are a clod.
>
> So do fuck off you feckless twerp and get back to editing your wedding
> videos.
>
>
> Smarty wrote:
>> Spex,
>>
>> The wonderful think about newsgroup message exchanges like these is that
>> they are all permanently retained for everyone to read and review. About
>> one minute of reading / reviewing this thread makes it entirely obvious
>> that what I said below is absolutely true, namely, that my earlier
>> complaint / comment regarding Parallels not allowing access to internal
>> hard disks was not in any way answered by you at any time with a
>> technical alternative or solution. I only learned this alternative method
>> by calling Parallels support and complaining, and they, and NOT YOU,
>> provided a workaround which I then offered to this newsgroup yesterday
>> afternoon. You were clueless as to this workaround and never even
>> slightly indicated any awareness of it.
>>
>> You accused me of errors, and when challenged, make no attempt to reply
>> to describe them. You take new information which I provided to this
>> newsgroup, and for which you had no stated awareness and then claim that
>> I had finally discovered what you already knew. You punctuate your
>> distortions with "arse" and "idiot" as if this somehow makes your points
>> valid.
>>
>> You insult the intelligence / memory recall of readers of this newsgroup
>> by this twisted approach.
>>
>> Smarty
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Spex" <No.spam@ta.com> wrote in message
>> news:45daaf5a$0$8750$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
>>> Smarty wrote:
>>>> Mike,
>>>>
>>>> It's worth noting that Spex was unaware of this alternative solution to
>>>> the Parallels hard disk problem, and never made any mention of it
>>>> whatsoever in any of his several previous replies and comments on this
>>>> limitation. It is even more notable that his reply below, that I am
>>>> "now getting to where we are" suggests that I somehow had overlooked
>>>> some capability or feature that he was already aware of. It really got
>>>> me laughing out loud. It kinda reminds me of the grandkids playing the
>>>> game "I know something you don't know but I'm not going to tell you"
>>>> except in Spex case, he didn't know......
>>>>
>>>> Smarty
>>>>
>>> Nice one smartarse.
>>>
>>> You look like an idiot then try and turn it round. Very good.
>>>
>>> You've been found out.
>>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|