You are here: Re: Capture HD video directly from HDMI uncompressed « Video Production « DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Re: Capture HD video directly from HDMI uncompressed

Posted by Smarty on 02/22/07 21:04

Gene,

HDV does a pretty good job of it on a minDV tape, and 80 minute tapes for
HDV are on the market now. Not sure if you can pump HDMI video into an HDV
camcorder and have it record in HDV. If so, then capturing HD via the HDMI
port using the Blackmagic and then copying it to a miniDV with a camcorder
would be a sweet little archiving solution at relatively low cost. Nice to
see the Blackmagic has both HDMI IN and HDMI OUT ports. :-)

Smarty


"Gene" <genes@wildblue.net> wrote in message
news:cnnDh.9$Ar5.96351@news.sisna.com...
> You can get ~ 90+ minutes (~20GB) on a MiniDV camcorder tape:-)
> Wonder if that would be enough to make the movie
> look OK? It's probably a little better than a double
> sided DVD.
>
> $400 for a 1TB sounds like a fair price:
> http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/01/05/hitachi_unveils_first_1tb_hdd/
>
>
> Gene
>
>
>
>
>
> "Jan Panteltje" <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:erktje$h07$1@news.datemas.de...
>> On a sunny day (Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:35:11 -0500) it happened "Smarty"
>> <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in
>> <IeWdnaWQ04rybUDYnZ2dnUVZ_qemnZ2d@adelphia.com>:
>>
>>>Jan,
>>>
>>>What a refreshing and intelligent reply! I've done a bit of research on
>>>this
>>>specific topic, and it appears that "Port Multiplication" with SATA
>>>drives
>>>in a RAID is an available and more than adequate solution. The web link
>>>cited below shows simple to achieve 230 MB/sec performance and offers a
>>>solution up to around 265 MB/sec as well.
>>>
>>>
>>>http://www.macgurus.com/productpages/sata/PortMultiplicationGuide.php
>>>
>>>This will certainly fill disk drives quickly!!
>>>
>>>Given that cable boxes and satellite boxes are not generally providing
>>>HDCP
>>>over HDMI, this would appear to be an alternative method to directly
>>>capture
>>>cable and satellite HDTV at full resolution.
>>>
>>>Smarty
>>
>> Good info, thank you, good to know somebody already did all this..
>> Yes, it will take a lot of space:
>> at 200 MB / s for 90 minutes 90 x 60 x 200 = 1 080 000 MB say 1.1 Tera
>> Byte.
>> That is if you wanted to record a movie.
>> It would not be so good if you recorded from a settop box, or even from a
>> DVD player,
>> as the source would be mpeg2 or similar, and that is better recorded as
>> .ps or
>> transport stream, taking much less space.
>> But for directly from a HD camera it is the right stuff.
>> Then you need more space for editing, at least double the space, 10TB
>> would be nice.
>> Now let's extrapolate a bit:
>> In the 1980 ties we were at 10MB for a harddisk.
>> Now, say 20 years later, we are at 500 MB.
>> A factor 50 in 20 years.
>> So perhaps 10 years from now we have the 12 TB harddisks....
>> In 5 years from now the 6 TB, and that would be enough already.
>> Just to know where it will go :-)
>>
>>
>
>

 

Navigation:

[Reply to this message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"