|
|
Posted by the dog from that film you saw on 02/26/07 17:03
"kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote in message
news:sIqdnTO15d08Un_YnZ2dnUVZ8qaqnZ2d@giganews.com...
> http://forum.videohelp.com/viewtopic.php?t=323203
>
> " They are not trying very hard to make HI-DEF on Blu-Ray/HD-DVD look
> better than DVD. I watched several HD-DVD movies this weekend at a friends
> house on a 56" JVC D-ILA screen. Waterworld and a few other HD-DVD's
> looked like crap. The studios did not clean up the films. There were
> scratches, spots, hair, and dust on the transfer. This is a shoddy job and
> personally I will NEVER pay for a movie that looks like that! I've had
> enough of poor quality DVD transfers.
>
> I knew it would eventually happen to these hi-def transfers of older
> films. The studios are rushing them to market and not spending time to get
> a clean transfer. Sure, it looks hi-resolution, but with all the scratches
> spots, it makes it look like crap. If us amateurs can use software tools
> to take away spots, Hollywood should be able to also. "
>
nothing new there then.
i've seen quite a few dvds that originated from a ratty old vhs - complete
with tape stretch marks on screen.
crap in, crap out.
--
Gareth.
A french man who wanted a castle threw his cat into a pond.
http://www.audioscrobbler.com/user/dsbmusic/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|