|
|
Posted by S. Whitmore on 02/28/07 22:31
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:27:59 -0500, Bill <trash@chromehorse.net>
wrote:
>Okay. I'm trying to imagine one of the parties involved-- any of them--
>having "ethics and principles". Suppose somebody uploads a copyrighted
>video of Wolf Blitzer on CNN talking about the controversy over where--
>or whether-- Anna Nicole Smith should be buried.
If it was uploaded to Revver.com, it would presumably be rejected as a
copyright infringement. I've had my own creations questioned there, I
highly doubt that something from CNN is going to get through the
review process without it coming from someone with provable
authorization from CNN.
--
S. Whitmore
[Omit -bounce to respond]
Earn money with your new and existing photos and footage:
http://submit.shutterstock.com/?ref=65132
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|