|
|
Posted by nappy on 03/01/07 15:26
"S. Whitmore" <usenet-bounce@just-stuart.com> wrote in message
news:j90cu2djgbc6ceh8afbf37h7flnjaql3a7@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:27:59 -0500, Bill <trash@chromehorse.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Okay. I'm trying to imagine one of the parties involved-- any of them--
>>having "ethics and principles". Suppose somebody uploads a copyrighted
>>video of Wolf Blitzer on CNN talking about the controversy over where--
>>or whether-- Anna Nicole Smith should be buried.
>
> If it was uploaded to Revver.com, it would presumably be rejected as a
> copyright infringement. I've had my own creations questioned there, I
> highly doubt that something from CNN is going to get through the
> review process without it coming from someone with provable
> authorization from CNN.
Ha.. CNN is in such bad shape they would be happy if ANYONE posted their
videos anywhere. Let's not forget how much of CNN's broadcasts does not come
from their cameras.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|