|
|
Posted by Colin B on 03/03/07 18:35
"S. Whitmore" <usenet-bounce@just-stuart.com> wrote in message
news:hbjeu2t7g83mttplmkjosvp8c3jh5ohjab@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:53:20 +1300, "Colin B" <Colin B@cb.org> wrote:
>
>>With regard to the Rewer site, can anyone tell me what the current URL is
>>please? I tried www.rewer.com and I was told that I had arrived at "Die
>>Private Homepage von Jorg Rewer".
>
> It's Revver with two v's, not Rewer with a w. So www.revver.com
> should work, but the main site is now at:
>
> http://one.revver.com/
>
> (Your newsgroup reader will hopefully make that clickable.)
>
> As I think I said before, I'm not saying it's perfect -- but a) they
> have shown a consistent concern for respecting copyrights, and b) I've
> paid some bills with what I've earned on my videos there, so I'm
> satisfied with their site so far. I'm hoping they soon resolve some
> long-standing issues that will make it even more useful.
>
> I should also point out that it's not a "video sharing site" like
> YouTube, but a "video publishing and monetizing service." That might
> seem like an esoteric distinction, but when you realize the extent to
> which their API and other tools can be used to build your own
> video-enabled site with Revver as the back-end, you'll see that the
> look and feel of Revver's site (and the videos you may see there) are
> much less relevant than on a "typical" video destination site.
Thanks, if I was von Jorg Rewer, I would offer to sell my site to R e v v er
..com, it might be worthwhile! Apart from copyright considerations, I am
quite impressed with the Veoh site, the downloadable player, and the effort
to produce better picture quality than some of the other video sharing
sites. Being able to upload avi files would also help the picture quality,
rather than compressing the data into mpeg files. The R e v v er site is
great for serious video makers, so I appreciate the information you have
given us about that site.
Cheers, Colin
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|