|
|
Posted by def456 on 03/05/07 19:52
"def456" <def456@none.none> wrote in message
news:DEZGh.89$FG1.35@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>> No one named Barbara has
>> posted in your thread so far. A bit reminiscent of Monty Python.
>>
>> Either you pressed the wrong button on your news reader when you
>> attempted to "reply" or you're having a bit of fun at our expense...
>
> WRONG!!!!!!!!!
>
> Herebelow is the first post which started this thread, which I posted
> under in the usual nested fashion. My post appears underneat this one! So
> "Barbara" started this thread! If you don't see that prior post from
> "Barbara", then your news service didn't pick it up or filtered it out....
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Barbara" <email censored!>
> Newsgroups: alt.video.dvd
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:33
> Subject: Copy protection used on HD-DVD and Blu-ray discs is said to be
> "cracked"
>
>
>> HD DVD is one of two leading high-definition video disc formats
>> attempting to replace DVDs. An HD DVD disc can store about four times
>> as much data as a DVD disc and it supports playback of "true" high-
>> definition video. In addition, HD DVDs have more advanced copy
>> protection than DVDs. The movie industry has been trying to shift the
>> market away from DVD and towards high-definition formats partly
>> because DVDs have become so easy to copy....
>>
>> [link censored!]
>>
>> Enjoy !!
I have just reset this newsgroup, redownloaded all headers, and my post
still shows underneath Barbara's post. So this is Barbara's thread, not
mine! It may be that different newsreaders handle it differently, I don't
know. When I replied to Barbara, I changed the subject line and deleted her
message body from my reply. Some newsreaders might mis-interpret that as
starting a new thread, but Outlook Express considers it as a nested reply to
Barbara's post. There must be some kind of link in the headers to her prior
post. I've been active on newsgroups with Outlook Express for over 7 years
and never had a prior problem in that regard.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|