|
|
Posted by Richard C. on 03/06/07 15:16
"def456" <def456@none.none> wrote in message
news:DEZGh.89$FG1.35@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>> No one named Barbara has
>> posted in your thread so far. A bit reminiscent of Monty Python.
>>
>> Either you pressed the wrong button on your news reader when you
>> attempted to "reply" or you're having a bit of fun at our expense...
>
> WRONG!!!!!!!!!
>
> Herebelow is the first post which started this thread, which I posted
> under in the usual nested fashion. My post appears underneat this one! So
> "Barbara" started this thread! If you don't see that prior post from
> "Barbara", then your news service didn't pick it up or filtered it out....
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Barbara" <email censored!>
> Newsgroups: alt.video.dvd
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:33
> Subject: Copy protection used on HD-DVD and Blu-ray discs is said to be
> "cracked"
>
>
>> HD DVD is one of two leading high-definition video disc formats
>> attempting to replace DVDs. An HD DVD disc can store about four times
>> as much data as a DVD disc and it supports playback of "true" high-
>> definition video. In addition, HD DVDs have more advanced copy
>> protection than DVDs. The movie industry has been trying to shift the
>> market away from DVD and towards high-definition formats partly
>> because DVDs have become so easy to copy....
>>
>> [link censored!]
>>
>> Enjoy !!
>>
=====================
Please note, oh dense one, the subject of THIS thread (which YOU created)
is "caution with that link!"
The subject of "barbara's" thread is CLEARLY
"Copy protection used on HD-DVD and Blu-ray discs is said to be 'cracked'"
You proved our point with your re-posting.
Whenever YOU change the subject line, it makes a new thread.
YOU did just that with no quoting of what you were talking about.
==============================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|